The piece is on the old tennis court of Fort D.A. Russell, a surface which I formerly thought was simply a contrast to the material, Icelandic lava rock. Now that Marfa is happily in rainy season, I understand the tennis court as a slight depression in the ground which briefly collects water and reflects the piece post-storm. In reading about both Donald Judd's and Ilya Kabakov's work (Long's neighbors in Chinati's collection), it seems a common thread in these works is an invitation to view them with a childlike questioning--what is this thing, physically? is that sheet opaque or translucent? is that solid or open space? or even, sans words. To view the piece without the curiosity of a child is to leave the piece incomplete.
Tuesday, July 7, 2009
I am currently in love
with the Richard Long piece. One of the fabulous things about working at the Chinati Foundation is getting to commune with the artwork in the collection daily and over seasonal/climate changes. I have recently discovered Chinati's Long piece, Sea Lava Circles, anew.



The piece is on the old tennis court of Fort D.A. Russell, a surface which I formerly thought was simply a contrast to the material, Icelandic lava rock. Now that Marfa is happily in rainy season, I understand the tennis court as a slight depression in the ground which briefly collects water and reflects the piece post-storm. In reading about both Donald Judd's and Ilya Kabakov's work (Long's neighbors in Chinati's collection), it seems a common thread in these works is an invitation to view them with a childlike questioning--what is this thing, physically? is that sheet opaque or translucent? is that solid or open space? or even, sans words. To view the piece without the curiosity of a child is to leave the piece incomplete.
The piece is on the old tennis court of Fort D.A. Russell, a surface which I formerly thought was simply a contrast to the material, Icelandic lava rock. Now that Marfa is happily in rainy season, I understand the tennis court as a slight depression in the ground which briefly collects water and reflects the piece post-storm. In reading about both Donald Judd's and Ilya Kabakov's work (Long's neighbors in Chinati's collection), it seems a common thread in these works is an invitation to view them with a childlike questioning--what is this thing, physically? is that sheet opaque or translucent? is that solid or open space? or even, sans words. To view the piece without the curiosity of a child is to leave the piece incomplete.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment